Frequently Asked Questions

Applications use governed platform services while enterprise systems connect through approved API, FHIR, event or webhook interfaces. System-of-record ownership stays explicit per deployment.

Trusted Care can validate subject, time, unit and quality context, evaluate configured monitoring rules, create accountable review work, and retain acknowledgement/escalation/resolution evidence. Clinical response remains the provider’s responsibility.

Compatibility is tied to the exact model, firmware/OS, interface and measurement profile. Vendor-declared capability is kept separate from Trusted Care integration verification and regulatory status.

Yes. Access can consider role, organization/workspace, patient or care relationship, purpose and current consent/delegation. Sensitive actions can require step-up or additional approval.

Trusted Care applies configured purpose, minimization, authorization and disclosure controls. The customer remains responsible for lawful basis, source-system obligations and deployment-specific retention policy.

Withdrawal changes future authorization decisions according to policy. Historical evidence may be retained where accountability, legal hold or configured retention requires it.

The architecture provides FHIR R4, REST/OpenAPI, events, signed webhooks, DeviceKit and OAuth/mTLS patterns. The exact enabled interfaces depend on the deployment and approved integration profile.

Register accountable ownership, use least privilege, test happy and failure paths in sandbox, demonstrate observability and recovery, and complete the production-readiness review for the confirmed environment.

Confirm tenant/data boundary, connectivity, system-of-record ownership, identity/access, consent/privacy, device/integration profile, monitoring, recovery, credentials, failure handling and accountable owners.